Since its launch last September, OpenSanctions has nearly doubled its scope to 204,000 persons and entities of interest from across 43 data sources.
In this post, we want to take a step back from current events and address another question: As our initial PrototypeFund grant wraps up, it’s time to set this project on a new trajectory.
Following the introduction of business licenses for our datasets in December, we’ve seen an incredibly encouraging reaction from companies across the fintech and open source intelligence sectors. The notion that due diligence data can be better if it is made more open and more transparent seems to have struck a nerve.
That support also means we have the necessary momentum to take OpenSanctions from an experiment in open data towards a sustainable and long-lived resource. The partnerships we’ve formed so far compel us not just to maintain, but also to grow and advance it.
Our vision is to make OpenSanctions a meeting place between those who are trying to map out the structure of financial crime and those who want to avoid facilitating it. In short: OpenSanctions is about changing the how of accountability data, much like Wikipedia has changed how we think about an encyclopedia. Transparent process and open access lead us to question the authority of long-serving brands like Britannica, or LexisNexis.
What is our goal?
All of this will take both time and the support and trust of many additional partners. As we build out OpenSanctions, there will be many more posts to elaborate components of this plan. We hope many of you will join us on this journey!
This article is part of OpenSanctions, the open database of sanctions targets and persons of interest.